Your Tax Dollars and the Global Warming Hoax
88February 9, 2011
In a previous Hub I wrote about how stunned I am that anyone would believe in Global Warming any longer. Oh – ahem ---- excuse me – they’re calling it “Climate Change” these days.
Why did they change the name? Because Al Gore and his adherents predicted with
absolute certainty, that the earth’s temperature was rising. In his movie “An
Inconvenient Truth” apparently polar bears were dying. Ice caps were melting
and well…essentially…the Great Green Apocalypse was imminent. There was no
arguing with these people. It was as factual to them as is the “Bush (and now
Palin) Derangement Syndrome.”
The real joke is (although the joke is at taxpayer expense) the earth’s climate DOES change and has so since man has recorded these things. The environmental movement is the hugest hoax ever perpetuated on the world aside from the need for a U.N. and all it entails.
We have subsequently discovered the scientist’s findings, upon which Mr. Gore and his cult followers based all of their dire predictions on - were lying. Think Climategate.
These so-called environmental scientists found out (who knew?) that the earth’s temperature was actually cooling, not warming, so they had to scramble around to change it the name from Global Catastrophic Warming to “Climate Change.”
Okey Dokey!
If you buy that, I have this bridge in Brooklyn I’d love to sell you at a bargain basement price…
Anyway, I digress…
This is an issue, especially with this President, that we need to stay on top of if we ever want to gut the deficit looming over our collective U.S. heads. All of your money that goes into these cock-a-maime-ie programs could be saved if we collectively demand it from our lawmakers. The President calls it “investing” in “Green jobs.” I call it taking tax dollars and throwing it down a big black hole.
For example, did you know your tax dollars—in the billions—went to environmental law firms?
This of course doesn’t include the EPA. How much does this overreaching, overbloated government bureaucracy cost taxpayers?
How much does the Global Change Research Information Office (GCRIO) cost us? If you can find out – let me know. While there was a wealth of information about what they do on their website, I couldn’t find out what it costs the taxpayers to do what is they supposedly do.
I do know that the EPA comes up with brilliant ideas like taxpayers paying about $200 per every cow and pig as a “fine” if you will, for cow and pig flatulence. I’m not making this up.
Just your tax dollars at work here folks.
We have a whole huge department in our federal government called “Climate Change.” Within this department, we have a taxpayer-funded agency that describes itself as:
[T]he focal point within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for the development, coordination, and implementation of DOE-related aspects of climate change technical programs, policies, and initiatives.
Were you aware that this is just a tent, as it were, for multiple other federally funded “green” agencies? Federal agencies like, The U.S. Climate Change Technology Program (CCTP) or The Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE). The EERE “invests” your tax dollars:
…in clean energy technologies that strengthen the economy, protect the environment, and reduce dependence on foreign oil.
The number of these agencies on the Energy.gov page is legion. The amount of tax dollars spent on these and other programs are a big question mark. No matter how hard I looked, I couldn’t find one bit of information about how much all of these agencies cost us taxpayers. Mr. Obama likes to call it an “investment” but when we look at the definition of that word that’s not at all what it is.
investment
1. In finance, the purchase of a financial product or other item of value with an expectation of favorable future returns. In general terms, investment means the use [of] money in the hope of making more money
I prefer the more descriptive term “stealing”. I haven’t seen the results of any federal government agency, program or pork barrel initiative ever make money for my benefit or for the benefit of any taxpayer.
I leave you with this as this Hub can’t possibly be a comprehensive accounting of all that is spent on environmental pet projects and their associated agencies.
There are federal grants given to environmental activists.
YOUR tax dollars supports these grants or in the least subsidizes these green organizations that offer grants.
Isn’t that just special? How many more “grants” for “green initiatives” are
using your tax dollars? I’m just sayin’…
You want more jobs? You want to reduce our deficit? Ask our lawmakers to start with the EPA and clearing out all of the hokey and debunked taxpayer paid green energy programs that are in our Federal Government. Start by simply closing down and firing every one of these overpaid useless workers. Then gut the grants that tax dollars pay for. I’m betting we’d see at least a trillion dollars shaved off of the deficit! If I were a betting woman…
CommentsLoading...
cjv, Good jod, very well done. A certain amount of the public (about 20%) will always believe what is said by Liberals or Conservatives. That's just the way it is. H
Carol it seems that Inhofe from Oklahoma and the EPA are now locking horns. And I like the challenge he presents to them. It seems every Government agency with capital letters, EPA , DHS and so on and so forth are just getting a little to big for their britches. There is definitely climate change these last 10 years have been different. But I am starting to believe this has more to do with the magnetic polar shift that is happening now. And there is no law the EPA can pass that will change that.
Carol -
Prince Charles would probably say you are misleading people. At least, that was his official take in the news yesterday.
Good write.
All the Best,
Tim
Great Hub CJV- Junk science is what it's all been about since as far back as the 1980's when the average temp data didn't support the thesis and they started dropping off the measuring points in the higher elevations. Average global temp hasn't been accurate since 1991. Keep up the good work!
LOve you too, Carol, but you are so incredibly off base here--TIme to take some science classes
Where there's panic, there's power. Governments always need something to save us from so that they can get more and more of our money. And if I DID believe in man-made climate change, Al Gore would still embarrass the hell out of me.
Obumma and his totally out of control EPA, without congressional action, are DESTROYING my state of WV because they are revoking previously approved permits in order to curtail coal mining. Energy is a valuable commodity, and we have plenty of it here in the USA, but the enviro-whackos AND this administration would rather see us enrich other nations and cost ALL Americans higher prices for their energy needs because Gore and his other nutty friends refuse to acknowledge the truth that the earth's climate DOES change, as it has for millions of years, and humans have very little effect on it. I know that China is growing a great economy, and they are building and USING coal-fired plants to make energy. Too bad for America that the libs would rather see ALL of us suffer and pay more instead of using the resources God gave to us!
Fines for pig and cow flatulence: some marauders did in our dozen chickens. We thought it must be coyotes. Now I'm wondering about the EPA.
The key term is Global, yet California has decided to take it on.
California government is either not very smart or they are really smart like a fox.
We barely can predict weather, and now they want to change the weather.
go figure.
Very good hub. Thanks.
CJV, Voted UP...great hub...Are you ready for your GoreBulbs for all your lighting needs? Bad science in the hands of a power hungry government, unhinged from the constraints of the Constitution, is a recipe for more big brother tactics and a reduction in both freedom and finances for "we the people"...
Keep hubbing
C02 is the easy scapegoat because of the massive quantity that is naturally and artificially produced. It's the easiest thing to use. How much arsenic is in the air? C02 is easily demonized and removing the man made portion would make ZERO difference, but taxing it would make a fortune. You have to tax what is available in quantity.
I am appalled by the infiltration of the Global Warming Agenda into schools. Kids are being taught it as fact. Sponge Bob Squarepants Cartoon talks about it as if it's fact. The EVIL MONEYCHANGERS are spinning their lies in order to implement the greatest profit creator of all time... the Carbon Tax.
I am further sickened when I find out a company I MUST do business with is donating to a Carbon Exchange to "Reduce their Carbon Footprint".
I have an idea for them... Humans are about 18% carbon. And we all exhale C02. So if these Climate Hippies want to stop the influx of man made carbon... they can do us all a favor and just stop breathing.
Pollution is real. C02 is NOT pollution, it is required for life, it is required for plants to grow.
If the people behind these Global Warming Agendas were so concerned about the Environment they would start with Water. And they would create programs that didn't create taxes and make certain individuals extremely wealthy.
Obama of course has personal investment in Carbon Exchanges.
“While on the board of a Chicago-based charity, Barack Obama helped fund a carbon trading exchange that will likely play a critical role in the cap-and-trade carbon reduction program he is now trying to push through Congress as president.”



















breakfastpop Level 8 Commenter 15 months ago
Great piece of writing. The EPA is the ugly ogre that keeps on growing and devouring everything in its path. They have been overstepping their bounds, so much so that even Congress is starting to wake up. Our earth is a living dynamic force and it is always changing. I have had enough of this garbage. Climate change should be called ClimateGate and nothing else. Voted up and awesome.